Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

v2.4.1.9
Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements  
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
2.
Basis of Presentation and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
 
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“condensed financial statements”) have been prepared on a basis consistent with the Company’s December 31, 2014 audited consolidated financial statements, and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth therein. The condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules for interim financial information, and, therefore, omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present such statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”). The preparation of the condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which was filed with the SEC on March 17, 2015. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for a complete set of financial statements. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year or any future periods.
 
Derivative Liabilit
ies
for Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
 
Derivative liabilities for warrants to purchase common stock represent the fair value of warrants issued in connection with certain private placements of shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 7). The fair values of these warrants are presented as liabilities based on certain net cash settlement and exercise price reset, or “down round,” provisions. These derivative liabilities, which are recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are calculated utilizing the Monte Carlo simulation valuation method. Changes in the fair values of these warrants are recognized as other income or expense in the related statement of operations.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
The Company measures and records certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. GAAP provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority, referred to as Level 1, to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The next priority, referred to as Level 2, is given to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability. The lowest priority, referred to as Level 3, is given to unobservable inputs. The table below reflects the level of the inputs used in the Company’s fair value calculation for instruments carried at fair value at (see Note 7):
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)
   
Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
   
Total Fair Value
 
                                 
March 31, 2015
                               
Derivative liabilities - warrants
  $ -     $ -     $ 2,980,964     $ 2,980,964  
                                 
December 31, 2014
                               
Derivative liabilities - warrants
  $ -     $ -     $ 2,198,162     $ 2,198,162  
 
Carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
 
The table below reflects the carrying values and the estimated fair values, based on Level 3 inputs, of the Company’s outstanding notes payable, including the related accrued interest, at March 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Estimated
 
 
 
Carrying Values
 
 
Fair Values
 
Senior secured note payable, including accrued interest
  $ 4,562,416     $ 4,562,416  
2014 junior secured notes payable, including accrued interest
    3,382,150       3,733,375  
2010 junior secured notes payable, including accrued interest
    814,217       2,362,324  
 
Inventory
 
Inventory is carried at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out (FIFO) method) or net realizable value. All items included in inventory relate to the Company’s ClearPoint system. Software license inventory that is not expected to be utilized within the next twelve months is classified as a non-current asset. The Company periodically reviews its inventory for obsolete items and provides a reserve upon identification of potential obsolete items.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company’s revenues are comprised of: (1) product revenues resulting from the sale of ClearPoint system reusable products, disposable products and ClearTrace system components; (2) development service revenues; and (3) other service revenues. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the selling price or fee is fixed or determinable, collection is reasonably assured and, for product revenues, risk of loss has transferred to the customer. For all sales, the Company requires either a purchase agreement or a purchase order as evidence of an arrangement. The Company analyzes revenue recognition on an individual arrangement basis. The Company determines whether deliverables under an arrangement represent one or more separate units of accounting as defined by GAAP. Application of GAAP regarding multiple-element arrangements requires management to make subjective judgments about the values of the individual elements and whether delivered elements are separable from the other aspects of the contractual relationship.
 
 
(1)
Product Revenues
     
   
Sales of ClearPoint system reusable products:
Generally, revenues related to the sale of ClearPoint system reusable products are recognized upon installation of the system and the completion of training of at least one of the customer’s physicians, which typically occurs concurrently with the installation. Reusable products include software which is integral to the utility of the system as a whole. Sales of reusable products that have stand-alone value to the customer are recognized when risk of loss passes to the customer. Sales of ClearPoint reusable products to a distributor that has been trained to perform system installations and to conduct ClearPoint physician training are recognized at the time risk of loss passes to the distributor.
     
   
Sales of disposable products:
Revenues from the sale of disposable products, including ClearPoint system disposable products, are recognized at the time risk of loss passes to the customer, which is generally at shipping point or upon delivery to the customer’s location, depending on the agreed upon terms with the customer. 
     
   
Sales of ClearTrace components:
Revenues from sales of ClearTrace system components to research sites for non-commercial use are recognized at the time risk of loss passes to the customer, which is generally at shipping point or upon delivery to the customer’s location, depending on the agreed upon terms with the customer. The Company does not have regulatory clearance or approval to sell ClearTrace system components for commercial use.
 
 
(
2
)
 
Development Service Revenues
— The Company entered into an agreement to provide development services to a third party. Under the agreement, the Company earned revenue equal to costs incurred for outside expenses related to the development services provided, plus actual direct internal labor costs (including the cost of employee benefits), plus an overhead markup of the direct internal labor costs incurred. Revenues are recognized in the period in which the Company incurred the related costs.
 
 
(
3
)
Other Service Revenues
— Other service revenues are comprised of installation fees, training fees, shipping fees and service fees charged in connection with ClearPoint system installations and ClearPoint system service agreements. Typically, the Company bills upfront for service agreements, which have terms ranging from one to three years. These amounts are recognized as revenues ratably over the term of the related service agreement.
 
Net Income (Loss
)
Per Share
 
The Company computes basic net income (loss) per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share assumes the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock equivalents, unless the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive. For purposes of this calculation, common stock equivalents include the Company’s common stock options and common stock warrants. For purposes of computing diluted net income per share, the number of potential common stock equivalents is reduced by the number of shares the Company could have repurchased with the proceeds from issuance of the potentially dilutive shares.
 
Concentration Risks and Other Risks and Uncertainties
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company holds its cash and cash equivalents on deposit with financial institutions in the United States insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. At March 31, 2015, the Company had bank balances in excess of the insured limits of approximately $68,000, most of which was held on deposit to satisfy outstanding checks.
 
Accounts receivable at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and substantially all product revenues recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, relate to sales to customers located in the U.S. and to one distributor. At March 31, 2015, three customers represented 24%, 14% and 12% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance. At December 31, 2014, two customers represented 20% and 17% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance. No other customer represented more than 9% of total accounts receivable at March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, sales to two customers represented 17% and 14% of product revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, sales to a distributor represented 15% of product revenues and sales to two customers represented 13% and 12% of product revenues. No other single customer represented greater than 8% of product revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition, and generally does not require collateral from its customers. The Company will provide an allowance for doubtful accounts when collections become doubtful, but the Company has not experienced any credit losses or recorded any allowances to date.
 
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which creates a new Topic, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606. The standard is principle-based and provides a five-step model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This standard is effective for the Company beginning in 2017 and allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on future disclosures concerning its liquidity position.
 
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This ASU requires retrospective adoption and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its financial statements.